Why insist on participation?

Mark Emdin
September 2025

 

A participative methodology involves leaders, employees, and partners, those who are integral to the organisation in determining its future direction. This approach draws upon extensive research in behavioural science, organisation development, and systems thinking, all of which demonstrate that active involvement correlates with enhanced commitment and superior outcomes.

Our approach is founded on the principle of collaboration: we engage with individuals within organisations rather than acting on their behalf. In the context of organisation design and development, this is not merely a philosophical stance but an established method that fosters improved decision-making, stronger commitment, and enduring change.

Here’s why it matters.

  1. Quality of Decision-Making

No single perspective, regardless of seniority or experience, encompasses all aspects of an organisation. Involving input from various individuals provides access to distributed intelligence. This approach leads to:

  • Broader data: Information gathered from different levels and functions may highlight realities not visible from the boardroom.
  • Increased accuracy: Considering diverse viewpoints can help address potential blind spots and assumptions.
  • Systemic thinking: Participation across functions can clarify connections between strategy, structure, people, and culture.
  • These factors contribute to decisions that are more thoroughly informed and adaptable[i]

 

  1. Sense-Making from Multiple Perspectives

Organisations are complex social systems that include informal norms, unwritten rules, and tacit knowledge. A participative process enables stakeholders to:

  • Share lived experiences for a more accurate understanding of the organisation beyond what is depicted on organisational charts.
  • Develop a shared language to describe challenges and opportunities.
  • Identify underlying dynamics, such as power structures and unspoken assumptions, that can influence the outcomes of change initiatives.
  • Each perspective contributes partially. Every viewpoint offers some insight, and integrating these different perspectives can support a more comprehensive organisational understanding.
  • This collective sense-making can improve alignment and help create a consistent and unified change narrative[ii].

 

  1. Overcoming Resistance to Change

Extensive experience in organisational development supports the findings of Lewin, Marrow, and others: individuals are more likely to support initiatives they have contributed to shaping. Active participation fundamentally influences attitudes toward change:

  • From compliance to commitment: Individuals engage not merely due to directives, but through a sense of ownership over the solution.
  • From apprehension to empowerment: Involvement alleviates uncertainty and fosters confidence in managing transitions.
  • From passive resistance to proactive problem-solving: Stakeholders shift from potential obstacles to collaborative partners in successful change implementation.

The evidence underscores a key point: rather than imposing change externally, it is crucial to empower those affected by change to be actively involved in defining its direction[iii].

 

  1. Enabling Systemic Reviews

In organisation design, focusing solely on local optimisation without regard to the wider system may result in unintended effects. A participative methodology:

  • Involves as much of the system as is practical, so changes in one area are reviewed within the overall organisational context.
  • Aligns strategic goals, structure, processes, personnel, and culture to reduce fragmentation from addressing these aspects separately.
  • Supports identifying and addressing root causes rather than limiting attention to manifested symptoms.

System-wide participation assists organisations in conducting comprehensive diagnoses and developing integrated solutions. This approach can also help surface and manage unintended consequences early on. As organisations operate as interconnected systems, changes in one part can influence others; broad involvement can reveal these interactions promptly and support timely intervention[iv].

 

  1. Building Capability for the Future

Participation serves not only as an approach but also as a fundamental capability. Involving individuals in the processes of diagnosing, designing, and implementing change enables them to:

  • Develop change literacy, enhancing their ability and mindset to adapt effectively to future challenges.
  • Strengthen collaborative skills across organisational boundaries.
  • Acquire proficiency in navigating ambiguity, an essential skill in dynamic environments.

As a result, the organisation gradually becomes more self-reliant and less dependent on external assistance. Excessive delegation to outside consultants may provide immediate solutions, yet it diminishes opportunities for the organisation to build its own capacity for managing change. Optimal value is realised when consultants facilitate active participation rather than supplanting it[v].

 

  1. Safeguarding the Human Dimension

At Ammalo, organisational design is regarded as the interaction between design—including structures, processes, and strategy—and dynamics, which encompass behaviours, culture, and relationships. A participative methodology:

Incorporates respect, trust, and transparency throughout the process.

Establishes psychological safety that enables open discussion of challenging topics, critical for addressing covert processes and previously undiscussable matters.

Aligns formal organisational structures with the authentic experiences of its members[vi].

 

  1. It’s Proven to Work

From Marrow’s pioneering experiments in participative management to large-group interventions and Appreciative Inquiry, the participative ethos has been central to the most enduring innovations in OD. The evidence is clear: involvement is not a “soft” option, it is the high-performance route to sustained results[vii], [viii], [ix].


Our Non-Negotiable

Because we know participation works, we build it into every engagement, from diagnosing the current state to co-creating solutions and testing prototypes. It shapes not only the what of our work but the how: collaborative workshops, cross-functional design teams, and structured forums for open dialogue.

We insist on it not for ideological reasons, but because it delivers better designs, stronger commitment, and more adaptive organisations.

In short: if you want lasting change, you must invite people to build it with you.

 

[i] Kates, A., & Galbraith, J. R. (2007). Designing your organization: Using the STAR model to solve 5 critical design challenges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[ii] Stanford, N. (2010). Organization design or organization development? [Blog]. Retrieved from https://naomistanford.com/

[iii] Coch, L., & French, J. R. P. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1(4), 512–532.

[iv] Beckhard, R. (1969). Organization development: Strategies and models. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

[v] Burke, W. W. (2018). Organization change: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[vi] Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[vii] Coch, L., & French, J. R. P. (1948). Ibid

[viii] Marrow, A. J., Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. E. (1967). Management by participation: Creating a climate for personal and organizational development. New York: Harper & Row.

[ix] Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 129–169.

 

ammalo consulting organisation design participative approach


Want to speak to one of the team?  Drop us a line on hello@ammalo.org and we’ll be in touch.